Home  ›  What happens to the surface of the Earth when there is an increase in greenhouse gases?

What happens to the surface of the Earth when there is an increase in greenhouse gases?

Written By quinta-feira, 7 de abril de 2022 Add Comment Edit

Atmospheric phenomenon causing planetary warming

Greenhouse gases allow sunlight to pass through the atmosphere, heating the planet, only then blot and re-radiate the infrared radiation (heat) the planet emits

Quantitative analysis: Free energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and Earth'south surface, with greenhouse gases in the temper absorbing and emitting radiant heat, forming World's free energy balance.

The greenhouse outcome is a process that occurs when energy from a planet's lord's day goes through its atmosphere and warms the planet'south surface, but the atmosphere prevents the oestrus from returning directly to space, resulting in a warmer planet. Lite arriving from our Sunday passes through Earth'southward atmosphere and warms its surface. The warmed surface then radiates heat, which is absorbed by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide. Without the natural greenhouse event, Earth'south average temperature would be well below freezing. Electric current human-caused increases in greenhouse gases trap greater amounts of heat, causing the Earth to grow warmer over fourth dimension.[1] [2] [iii]

Anything warmed radiates energy related to its temperature – the Sun at nigh five,500 °C (ix,930 °F) sends most every bit visible and near infrared light, while Earth'southward average surface temperature about fifteen °C (59 °F) emits longer wavelength infrared radiant heat.[two] The atmosphere is transparent to most incoming sunlight, and allows its free energy through to the surface. The term greenhouse effect comes from a flawed illustration comparing this to transparent glass allowing sunlight into greenhouses, but greenhouses mainly retain heat by restricting air movement, unlike this issue.[4]

Most of the atmosphere is transparent to infrared, only a tiny proportion of greenhouse gases makes it near completely opaque to wavelengths emitted by the surface. Greenhouse gas molecules absorb and emit this infrared, and then heat up and emit radiant oestrus in all directions, warming other greenhouse gas molecules, and laissez passer heat on to the surrounding air. Radiant heat going downwardly farther increases the surface temperature, adding to energy going upwards into the temper. Without Earth'due south natural greenhouse effect the World would exist more than 30 °C (54 °F) colder.[five] [2]

Sunlight varies day and nighttime, past season, and by distance from the equator. About half of available sunlight is reflected from clouds and from the Globe'southward surface, depending on their reflectivity. Greenhouse gases vary in effect, fourth dimension in the atmosphere, and altitude, leading to positive feedbacks. Variations are evened out past Globe's heat engine causing energy flows. Somewhen, higher layers of the temper tend to emit about as much energy into space as is arriving from the Sun, forming Earth'due south energy residuum.[2]

A runaway greenhouse event occurs if positive feedbacks lead to the evaporation of all greenhouse gases into the atmosphere,[6] every bit happened with carbon dioxide and water vapor on Venus.[7]

History

The greenhouse result and its impact on climate were succinctly described in this 1912 Pop Mechanics article meant for reading past the general public.

The being of the greenhouse effect, while not named every bit such, was proposed by Joseph Fourier in 1824.[8] The argument and the evidence were further strengthened by Claude Pouillet in 1827 and 1838. John Tyndall was the first to mensurate the infrared absorption and emission of various gases and vapors. From 1859 onwards, he showed that the effect was due to a very small proportion of the atmosphere, with the main gases having no effect, and was largely due to water vapor, though modest percentages of hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide had a significant effect.[9] The effect was more fully quantified by Svante Arrhenius in 1896, who made the first quantitative prediction of global warming due to a hypothetical doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide.[10] Nonetheless, the term "greenhouse" was not used to refer to this result by any of these scientists; the term was first used in this way by Nils Gustaf Ekholm in 1901.[11] [12]

Description

The solar radiation spectrum for direct low-cal at both the height of Earth'southward atmosphere and at sea level

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report working grouping 1 defines the greenhouse effect as:

The infrared radiative upshot of all infrared-absorbing constituents in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases (GHGs), clouds, and some aerosols absorb terrestrial radiation emitted by the Earth'southward surface and elsewhere in the atmosphere. These substances emit infrared radiation in all directions, merely, everything else being equal, the net corporeality emitted to infinite is normally less than would have been emitted in the absence of these absorbers because of the decline of temperature with altitude in the troposphere and the consistent weakening of emission. An increase in the concentration of GHGs increases the magnitude of this effect; the difference is sometimes called the enhanced greenhouse event. The change in a GHG concentration because of anthropogenic emissions contributes to an instantaneous radiative forcing. Earth's surface temperature and troposphere warm in response to this forcing, gradually restoring the radiative balance at the top of the atmosphere.[13] : AVII-28

Earth receives energy from the Sun in the class of ultraviolet, visible, and nearly-infrared radiations. About 26% of the incoming solar energy is reflected back to space by the atmosphere and clouds, and 19% is absorbed past the atmosphere and clouds. Most of the remaining energy is absorbed at the surface of Earth. Because the Earth's surface is colder than the Lord's day, it radiates at wavelengths that are much longer than the wavelengths that were captivated. Most of this thermal radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere and warms information technology. The atmosphere also gains heat by sensible and latent heat fluxes from the surface. The atmosphere radiates energy both upward and downwardly; the part radiated downwards is captivated past the surface of Earth. This leads to a college equilibrium temperature than if the atmosphere did not radiate.

An ideal thermally conductive blackbody at the same distance from the Sun equally Earth would have a temperature of nearly 5.three °C (41.five °F). However, because Globe reflects about 30%[14] [15] of the incoming sunlight, this idealized planet'south constructive temperature (the temperature of a blackbody that would emit the same amount of radiation) would be about −18 °C (0 °F).[xvi] [17] The surface temperature of this hypothetical planet is 33 °C (59 °F) below Earth's actual surface temperature of approximately 14 °C (57 °F).[xviii] The greenhouse result is the contribution of greenhouse gases and aerosols to this difference, with imperfect modelling of clouds beingness the main doubtfulness.[19] : 7-61

Details

The arcadian greenhouse model is a simplification. In reality, the atmosphere near the Earth's surface is largely opaque to thermal radiation and nearly heat loss from the surface is by convection. Nonetheless radiative energy losses get increasingly important higher in the atmosphere, largely because of the decreasing concentration of water vapor, an important greenhouse gas. Rather than the surface itself, it is more than realistic to think of the greenhouse result as applying to a layer in the mid-troposphere, which is effectively coupled to the surface by a lapse rate. A simple motion-picture show also assumes a steady state, but in the real world, the diurnal cycle, as well as the seasonal bicycle and weather condition disturbances, complicate matters. Solar heating applies just during daytime. During the night, the atmosphere cools somewhat, merely non greatly, because its emissivity is low. Diurnal temperature changes subtract with height in the temper.

Within the region where radiative effects are important, the description given by the idealized greenhouse model becomes realistic. Earth's surface, warmed to an "effective temperature" around −18 °C (0 °F), radiates long-wavelength, infrared heat in the range of four–100 μm.[20] At these wavelengths, greenhouse gases that were largely transparent to incoming solar radiation are more absorbent.[xx] Each layer of the atmosphere with greenhouse gases absorbs some of the heat beingness radiated upwards from lower layers. It reradiates in all directions, both upwards and downwards; in equilibrium (by definition) the same amount as information technology has captivated. This results in more than warmth below. Increasing the concentration of the gases increases the amount of absorption and re-radiation, and thereby farther warms the layers and ultimately the surface below.[17]

Greenhouse gases—including near diatomic gases with two different atoms (such as carbon monoxide, CO) and all gases with three or more atoms—are able to absorb and emit infrared radiation. Though more than 99% of the dry atmosphere is IR transparent (because the chief constituents—Northward
2 , O
2 , and Ar—are not able to directly absorb or emit infrared radiation), intermolecular collisions cause the energy absorbed and emitted by the greenhouse gases to be shared with the other, non-IR-agile, gases.

Examples in the temper

Greenhouse gases

By their percent contribution to the greenhouse consequence on Globe, the four major greenhouse gases are:[21] [22]

Atmospheric gases only blot some wavelengths of energy only are transparent to others. The absorption patterns of water vapor (blue peaks) and carbon dioxide (pink peaks) overlap in some wavelengths. Carbon dioxide is not as strong a greenhouse gas as water vapor, merely it absorbs energy in longer wavelengths (12–15 micrometers) that h2o vapor does not, partially endmost the "window" through which heat radiated by the surface would commonly escape to space. (Illustration NASA, Robert Rohde)[23]

  • water vapor, ~50% (~75% including clouds)[24]
  • carbon dioxide, 9–26%
  • methane, 4–nine%
  • ozone, 3–7%

It is not possible to assign a specific percentage to each gas considering the absorption and emission bands of the gases overlap (hence the ranges given above). A h2o molecule just stays in the atmosphere for an boilerplate 8 to 10 days, which corresponds with loftier variability in the contribution from clouds and humidity at whatever detail time and location.[nineteen] : i-41

There are other influential gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect, including nitrous oxide (N2O), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).[xix] : AVII-60

Clouds

Clouds are special form of water that are highly influential to the Earth's free energy budget. Clouds absorb and emit infrared radiation and thus touch the radiative properties of the temper.[22] The issue of clouds is dependent on the type of clouds. Specific types of clouds can have great contributions to the greenhouse upshot. Higher clouds usually accept a larger greenhouse event,[nineteen] : 7-65 and at that place is tropical high-cloud altitude feedback.[19] : vii-66

Aerosols

A few aerosols absorb solar radiation,[25] the most important existence black carbon, on which research is ongoing as it causes several effects, not but the greenhouse effect.[26]

Role in climate alter

Strengthening of the greenhouse outcome through human activities is known every bit the enhanced (or anthropogenic) greenhouse outcome.[28] Too as existence inferred from measurements by the CERES satellite throughout the 21st century,[19] : 7-17 this increment in radiative forcing from human being activity has been observed directly,[29] [30] and is attributable mainly to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.[31] Co-ordinate to the 2014 Assessment Report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide are unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years. Their effects, together with those of other anthropogenic drivers, take been detected throughout the climate system and are extremely likely to have been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century'".[32]

CO2 is produced by fossil fuel burning and other activities such as cement production and tropical deforestation.[33] Measurements of COtwo from the Mauna Loa Observatory bear witness that concentrations have increased from almost 313 parts per million (ppm)[34] in 1960, passing the 400 ppm milestone in 2013.[35] The current observed amount of COtwo exceeds the geological record maxima (≈300 ppm) from ice core data.[36] The issue of combustion-produced carbon dioxide on the global climate, a special example of the greenhouse result first described in 1896 by Svante Arrhenius, has also been chosen the Callendar effect.

Over the past 800,000 years,[37] water ice core information shows that carbon dioxide has varied from values equally low as 180 ppm to the pre-industrial level of 270 ppm.[38] Paleoclimatologists consider variations in carbon dioxide concentration to be a fundamental cistron influencing climate variations over this fourth dimension scale.[39] [40]

Real greenhouses

The "greenhouse outcome" of the atmosphere is named by illustration to greenhouses which become warmer in sunlight. However, a greenhouse is not primarily warmed by the "greenhouse upshot".[41] "Greenhouse issue" is actually a misnomer since heating in the usual greenhouse is due to the reduction of convection,[42] [43] while the "greenhouse upshot" works past preventing absorbed heat from leaving the structure through radiative transfer.[1]

A greenhouse is built of whatsoever textile that passes sunlight: usually glass or plastic. The sun warms the ground and contents inside just like the outside, and these then warm the air. Outside, the warm air about the surface rises and mixes with cooler air aloft, keeping the temperature lower than inside, where the air continues to oestrus up because it is confined within the greenhouse. This tin be demonstrated past opening a small window near the roof of a greenhouse: the temperature will drop considerably. It was demonstrated experimentally (R. Westward. Forest, 1909) that a (not heated) "greenhouse" with a cover of stone salt (which is transparent to infrared) heats upward an enclosure similarly to one with a glass cover.[44] Thus greenhouses work primarily by preventing convective cooling.[43]

Heated greenhouses are however another matter: as they have an internal source of heating, it is desirable to minimize the corporeality of oestrus leaking out by radiative cooling. This tin can be done through the apply of adequate glazing.[45]

It is possible in theory to build a greenhouse that lowers its thermal emissivity during night hours;[46] such a greenhouse would trap heat past two unlike physical mechanisms, combining multiple greenhouse effects, i of which more closely resembles the atmospheric mechanism, rendering the misnomer fence moot.

Anti-greenhouse effect

The anti-greenhouse result is a mechanism similar and symmetrical to the greenhouse effect: in the greenhouse effect, the atmosphere lets radiation in while not letting thermal radiation out, thus warming the body surface; in the anti-greenhouse event, the atmosphere keeps radiation out while letting thermal radiation out, which lowers the equilibrium surface temperature. Such an event has been proposed for Saturn's moon Titan.[47]

Runaway greenhouse effect

A runaway greenhouse effect occurs if positive feedbacks lead to the evaporation of all greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.[6] A runaway greenhouse effect involving carbon dioxide and water vapor has long agone been hypothesized to have occurred on Venus,[48] this idea is withal largely accustomed.[7] The planet Venus experienced a delinquent greenhouse upshot, resulting in an atmosphere which is 96% carbon dioxide, and a surface atmospheric pressure roughly the same as found 900 m (3,000 ft) underwater on Globe. Venus may have had water oceans, just they would have boiled off as the hateful surface temperature rose to the current 735 Chiliad (462 °C; 863 °F).[49] [fifty] [51]

Bodies other than Globe

Apart from the Earth, there are other planets in the solar system that also take greenhouse effect. The greenhouse issue on Venus is specially large, which brings its surface temperature to as loftier as 462 °C (864 °F). This is due to several reasons:

  1. It is nearer to the Sun than Earth by about thirty%.
  2. Its very dense temper consists mainly of carbon dioxide, approximately 97%.[52]

"Venus experienced a runaway greenhouse outcome in the past, and we expect that World volition in about 2 billion years as solar luminosity increases".[53]

Titan is a body with both a greenhouse effect and an anti-greenhouse result. The presence of N2, CH4, and Htwo in the temper contribute to a greenhouse effect, increasing the surface temperature past 21K over the expected temperature of the body with no atmosphere. The being of a high-altitude brume, which absorbs wavelengths of solar radiation but is transparent to infrared, contribute to an anti-greenhouse effect of approximately 9K. The internet result of these 2 phenomena upshot is a net warming of 21K - 9K = 12K, and then Titan is 12 K warmer than it would be if at that place were no temper.[54] [55]

See too

  • Top contributors to greenhouse gas emissions
  • Lapse rate
  • Climate tipping signal
  • Radiative forcing
  • Global dimming
  • United nations Framework Convention on Climate change

References

  1. ^ a b A concise description of the greenhouse effect is given in the Intergovernmental Console on Climate Change Quaternary Cess Study, "What is the Greenhouse Effect?" FAQ 1.3 – AR4 WGI Chapter 1: Historical Overview of Climatic change Science Archived 5 August 2019 at the Wayback Automobile, IIPCC Fourth Assessment Study, Chapter 1, folio 115: "To balance the captivated incoming [solar] energy, the Earth must, on average, radiate the same corporeality of energy back to space. Considering the Earth is much colder than the Sun, it radiates at much longer wavelengths, primarily in the infrared part of the spectrum (see Figure 1). Much of this thermal radiation emitted by the land and bounding main is captivated by the atmosphere, including clouds, and reradiated back to Globe. This is called the greenhouse effect."
    Schneider, Stephen H. (2001). "Global Climatic change in the Human Perspective". In Bengtsson, Lennart O.; Hammer, Claus U. (eds.). Geosphere-biosphere Interactions and Climate. Cambridge Academy Printing. pp. xc–91. ISBN978-0-521-78238-8. Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2018.
    Claussen, Eastward.; Cochran, V.A.; Davis, D.P., eds. (2001). "Global Climate Data". Climatic change: Science, Strategies, & Solutions. Academy of Michigan. p. 373. ISBN978-9004120242. Archived from the original on 18 May 2020. Retrieved 1 June 2018.
    Allaby, A.; Allaby, Thousand. (1999). A Dictionary of Earth Sciences . Oxford University Press. p. 244. ISBN978-0-19-280079-4.
  2. ^ a b c d Rebecca, Lindsey (xiv January 2009). "Climate and Earth's Free energy Budget : Feature Manufactures". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 14 Dec 2020.
  3. ^ Vaclav Smil (2003). The Earth'due south Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Modify. MIT Printing. p. 107. ISBN978-0-262-69298-4. Archived from the original on 29 August 2016. Retrieved xviii February 2016.
  4. ^ Mann, Michael Eastward.; Kump, Lee R. (2008). Dire predictions: understanding global warming . DK. pp. 22–23. ISBN978-0-7566-3995-two.
  5. ^ IPCC AR4 WG1 (2007), Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, Thousand.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor, 1000.; Miller, H.Fifty. (eds.), Climate change 2007: The Concrete Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Quaternary Cess Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN978-0-521-88009-1, archived from the original on 5 Baronial 2019, retrieved 5 August 2019 (atomic number 82: 978-0-521-70596-7)
  6. ^ a b Kasting, James F. (1991). "Delinquent and moist greenhouse atmospheres and the development of Earth and Venus.". Planetary Sciences: American and Soviet Research/Proceedings from the U.S.-U.Southward.S.R. Workshop on Planetary Sciences. Committee on Applied science and Technical Systems (CETS). pp. 234–245. Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  7. ^ a b McCarthy, Michael Cabbage and Leslie. "NASA climate modeling suggests Venus may have been habitable". Climate change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Archived from the original on 11 August 2021. Retrieved 11 Baronial 2021.
  8. ^ Fourier, J. (1824). "Remarques Generales sur les Temperatures Du Globe Terrestre et des Espaces Planetaires". Annales de Chimie et de Physique (in French). 27: 136–167. Archived from the original on two August 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  9. ^ John Tyndall, Heat considered equally a Mode of Motion (500 pages; twelvemonth 1863, 1873)
  10. ^ Held, Isaac Chiliad.; Soden, Brian J. (November 2000). "Water Vapor Feedback and Global Warming". Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 25: 441–475. CiteSeerXten.1.1.22.9397. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.i.441.
  11. ^ Easterbrook, Steve (18 August 2015). "Who starting time coined the term "Greenhouse Effect"?". Serendipity. Archived from the original on 13 November 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  12. ^ Ekholm Northward (1901). "On The Variations Of The Climate Of The Geological And Historical Past And Their Causes". Quarterly Journal of the Imperial Meteorological Gild. 27 (117): 1–62. Bibcode:1901QJRMS..27....1E. doi:10.1002/qj.49702711702.
  13. ^ "Annex VII - Glossary" (PDF). {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
  14. ^ "NASA Earth Fact Sail". Nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 25 December 2015. Retrieved 15 October 2010.
  15. ^ Jacob, Daniel J. (1999). "7. The Greenhouse Outcome". Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry. Princeton University Press. ISBN978-1400841547. Archived from the original on iii October 2010. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
  16. ^ "Solar Radiation and the Earth'south Energy Balance". Eesc.columbia.edu. Retrieved 15 October 2010.
  17. ^ a b Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment Report. Chapter 1: Historical overview of climate modify science Archived 26 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine page 97
  18. ^ The elusive "absolute surface air temperature," see GISS give-and-take Archived 5 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  19. ^ a b c d eastward f "IPCC AR6 WG1" (PDF). {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  20. ^ a b Mitchell, John F. B. (1989). "The "Greenhouse" effect and Climate Change" (PDF). Reviews of Geophysics. 27 (ane): 115–139. Bibcode:1989RvGeo..27..115M. CiteSeerX10.1.one.459.471. doi:10.1029/RG027i001p00115. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 June 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2008.
  21. ^ "H2o vapour: feedback or forcing?". RealClimate. 6 Apr 2005. Archived from the original on 24 June 2007. Retrieved 1 May 2006.
  22. ^ a b Kiehl, J.T.; Trenberth, Kevin E. (February 1997). "Globe's Almanac Global Mean Energy Budget" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 78 (2): 197–208. Bibcode:1997BAMS...78..197K. CiteSeerX10.1.1.168.831. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0197:EAGMEB>2.0.CO;2. Archived from the original (PDF) on xxx March 2006. Retrieved 1 May 2006.
  23. ^ "NASA: Climate Forcings and Global Warming". 14 January 2009. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved xx Apr 2014.
  24. ^ Gavin Schmidt (1 Oct 2010). "Taking the Measure of the Greenhouse Effect". NASA Goddard Establish for Space Studies - Science Briefs.
  25. ^ "Aerosols and their Relation to Global Climate and Climate Sensitivity | Learn Scientific discipline at Scitable". www.nature.com . Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  26. ^ "Black Carbon Aerosol (Centre for Atmospheric Scientific discipline - The University of Manchester)". www.cas.manchester.air conditioning.uk . Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  27. ^ Joseph Atkinson (22 June 2021). "Earth Matters: Earth'due south Radiation Budget is Out of Balance". NASA Earth Observatory.
  28. ^ "Enhanced greenhouse effect — Glossary". Nova. Australian Academy of Scihuman impact on the environs. 2006. Archived from the original on 1 April 2008. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
  29. ^ Robert McSweeney (25 February 2015). "New written report directly measures greenhouse result at Earth'due south surface". Carbon Brief. Archived from the original on 18 Apr 2021. Retrieved 18 Apr 2021.
  30. ^ "Straight observations confirm that humans are throwing Earth'southward energy upkeep off balance". phys.org. Science X. 26 March 2021. Archived from the original on xviii April 2021. Retrieved 18 Apr 2021.
  31. ^ "Enhanced Greenhouse Consequence". Ace.mmu.air conditioning.uk. Archived from the original on 24 Oct 2010. Retrieved fifteen October 2010.
  32. ^ "Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC 5th Assessment Report. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 November 2018. Retrieved xx June 2017.
  33. ^ IPCC Quaternary Cess Study, Working Grouping I Report "The Concrete Scientific discipline Basis" Archived xv March 2011 at the Wayback Machine Affiliate 7
  34. ^ "Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide – Mauna Loa". NOAA. Archived from the original on twenty May 2019. Retrieved 8 December 2008.
  35. ^ "Climate Milestone: Earth'due south CO2 Level Passes 400 ppm". National Geographic. 12 May 2013. Archived from the original on 15 December 2013. Retrieved ten December 2017.
  36. ^ Hansen J. (February 2005). "A slippery slope: How much global warming constitutes "unsafe anthropogenic interference"?". Climatic change. 68 (333): 269–279. Bibcode:2005ClCh...68..269H. doi:x.1007/s10584-005-4135-0. S2CID 153165132. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  37. ^ "Deep ice tells long climate story". BBC News. iv September 2006. Archived from the original on 30 Dec 2012. Retrieved iv May 2010.
  38. ^ Hileman B (28 November 2005). "Ice Core Tape Extended". Chemic & Technology News. 83 (48): 7. doi:x.1021/cen-v083n048.p007. Archived from the original on 15 May 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2006.
  39. ^ Bowen, Mark (2006). Thin Ice: Unlocking the Secrets of Climate in the World's Highest Mountains. Owl Books. ISBN978-1429932707. Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved i June 2018.
  40. ^ Temperature change and carbon dioxide change Archived 18 Jan 2017 at the Wayback Machine, U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  41. ^ Brian Shmaefsky (2004). Favorite demonstrations for college science: an NSTA Press journals drove. NSTA Press. p. 57. ISBN978-0-87355-242-4. Archived from the original on 2 August 2020. Retrieved eighteen February 2016.
  42. ^ Oort, Abraham H.; Peixoto, José Pinto (1992). Physics of climate. New York: American Constitute of Physics. ISBN978-0-88318-711-ane. ...the name water vapor-greenhouse effect is actually a misnomer since heating in the usual greenhouse is due to the reduction of convection
  43. ^ a b Schroeder, Daniel V. (2000). An introduction to thermal physics. Addison-Wesley. pp. 305–seven. ISBN978-0-321-27779-4. ... this mechanism is chosen the greenhouse consequence, even though almost greenhouses depend primarily on a different mechanism (namely, limiting convective cooling).
  44. ^ Wood, R.W. (1909). "Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse". Philosophical Magazine. 17 (98): 319–320. doi:ten.1080/14786440208636602. Archived from the original on 7 Baronial 2011. Retrieved 23 January 2005. When exposed to sunlight the temperature rose gradually to 65 °C., the enclosure covered with the table salt plate keeping a petty alee of the other because it transmitted the longer waves from the Sun, which were stopped past the glass. In order to eliminate this activity the sunlight was first passed through a drinking glass plate." "it is clear that the rock-salt plate is capable of transmitting practically all of it, while the glass plate stops information technology entirely. This shows us that the loss of temperature of the ground past radiation is very small in comparison to the loss by convection, in other words that nosotros proceeds very little from the circumstance that the radiations is trapped.
  45. ^ Kurpaska, Sławomir (2014). "Energy effects during using the glass with dissimilar properties in a heated greenhouse" (PDF). Technical Sciences. 17 (4): 351–360. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 Nov 2015. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
  46. ^ Darrin, Ann (2000). "Variable emissivity through MEMS technology". ITHERM 2000. The Seventh Intersociety Briefing on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (Cat. No.00CH37069). pp. 264–270. doi:ten.1109/ITHERM.2000.866834. hdl:2060/20000089965. ISBN0-7803-5912-7. S2CID 109389129. Archived from the original on 24 June 2018. Retrieved seven January 2021. Specialized thermal control coatings, which tin can passively or actively arrange their emissivity offer an attractive solution to these [spacecraft] design challenges.
  47. ^ "Titan: Greenhouse and Anti-greenhouse". Astrobiology Magazine – earth scientific discipline – evolution distribution Origin of life universe – life across :: Astrobiology is report of world. Archived from the original on 22 July 2020. Retrieved 15 October 2010.
  48. ^ Rasool, I.; De Bergh, C. (June 1970). "The Runaway Greenhouse and the Aggregating of CO2 in the Venus Atmosphere" (PDF). Nature. 226 (5250): 1037–9. Bibcode:1970Natur.226.1037R. doi:x.1038/2261037a0. PMID 16057644. S2CID 4201521. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 October 2011.
  49. ^ Hashimoto, Thousand. 50.; Roos-Serote, M.; Sugita, Southward.; Gilmore, Thou. South.; Kamp, L. Due west.; Carlson, R. West.; Baines, K. H. (2008). "Felsic highland crust on Venus suggested by Galileo Near-Infrared Mapping Spectrometer data". Journal of Geophysical Enquiry: Planets. 113 (E9): E00B24. Bibcode:2008JGRE..113.0B24H. doi:10.1029/2008JE003134. S2CID 45474562.
  50. ^ David Shiga (10 Oct 2007). "Did Venus's ancient oceans incubate life?". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 24 March 2009. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
  51. ^ Jakosky, Bruce M. (1999). "Atmospheres of the Terrestrial Planets". In Beatty, J. Kelly; Petersen, Carolyn Collins; Chaikin, Andrew (eds.). The New Solar Organisation (4th ed.). Boston: Sky Publishing. pp. 175–200. ISBN978-0-933346-86-iv. OCLC 39464951.
  52. ^ McKay, C.; Pollack, J.; Courtin, R. (1991). "The greenhouse and antigreenhouse furnishings on Titan". Science. 253 (5024): 1118–1121. Bibcode:1991Sci...253.1118M. doi:10.1126/science.11538492. PMID 11538492. S2CID 10384331.
  53. ^ Goldblatt, Colin; Watson, Andrew J. (2012). "The Runaway Greenhouse: Implications for Future Climate change, Geoengineering and Planetary Atmospheres". Philosophical Transactions of the Regal Society of London A: Mathematical, Concrete and Engineering Sciences. 370 (1974): 4197–4216. arXiv:1201.1593. Bibcode:2012RSPTA.370.4197G. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0004. JSTOR 41582871. PMID 22869797. S2CID 7891446.
  54. ^ McKay, C. P.; Pollack, J. B.; Courtin, R. (half dozen September 1991). "The greenhouse and antigreenhouse furnishings on Titan". Science. 253 (5024): 1118–1121. Bibcode:1991Sci...253.1118M. doi:10.1126/science.11538492. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 11538492. S2CID 10384331.
  55. ^ "Titan: Greenhouse and Anti-greenhouse". Astrobiology Mag. 3 November 2005. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2019.

Further reading

  • Henderson-Sellers, Ann; McGuffie, Kendal (2005). A climate modelling primer (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN978-0-470-85750-2.

External links

  • Rutgers University: World Radiation Budget Archived i September 2006 at the Wayback Machine

martineswhearding.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect

0 Response to "What happens to the surface of the Earth when there is an increase in greenhouse gases?"

Postar um comentário

Assinar: Postar comentários (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel